Make Good Agreements – Amendments to the Water Act Burden Resource Companies

Amendments were passed on 6 December 2016, to the Water Act 2000 (Qld) (“Act”), improving Landholders positions when negotiating Make Good Agreements (“MGAs”).

Explanatory Notes to the Act, provide:

“While resource companies are under additional obligations in regards to make good agreements, this is justified because it ensures the appropriate apportionment of burden. Therefore, insofar as the amendments are regarded to impose liability, the amendments should be regarded to be fair and reasonable.”

This recognition is great news for Landholders who have experienced difficulties and expense in negotiation of MGAs with a resource company in the past.

Of note, the Act has broadened the responsibilities of the resource company during the negotiation of the MGA, the resource company is to:

  • pay the Landholder’s reasonable costs in engaging a qualified hydrogeologist for the purposes of negotiating a MGA: section 423(3) of the Act;
  • bear the costs of any alternative dispute resolution undertaken in the negotiation process of the MGA: section 426(4), (7) of the Act; and
  • use its best endeavours to enter into a MGA within forty (40) business days after the bore assessment is undertaken section 423(2)(a) of the Act.

Further, the Act grants the following to Landholders:

  • Extends the type of bores to be the subject of a MGA to include bores affected by “free gas”: section 412(3)(b) of the Act;
  • Extends the type of bores to be the subject of a MGA to include bores where a resource activity has likely caused or materially contributed to the decline in water quality or quantity: section 412 of the Act; and
  • Provides for a five (5) business day cooling off period which starts on the day the MGA is entered into: section 423A(5) of the Act.

Prior to entering into negotiations with a resource company, Landholders are encouraged to seek independent legal advice to ensure that their interests are adequately protected.

Conclusion

Amendments to the Act do not substantially vary the process by which Landholders and resource companies negotiate and enter into MGAs. However, the amendments:

  • Specify particular costs which are to be borne by the resource company;
  • Broaden the types of bores which may be subject to a MGA; and
  • Provide a cooling-off period for Landholders who have entered into a MGA.

Landholders now have been provided a more transparent regime and are placed in a better position in their negotiations of an MGA.

Emanate Legal have a dedicated and experienced legal team dealing with negotiating and drafting MGAs. We are available to discuss any queries a Landholder may have.


More Articles


Important Changes to Vegetation Mapping

Updated maps are now available to download. The new maps include the most recent Queensland Herbarium scientific updates to the Regulated Vegetation Management Map, regional ecosystems, wetland, high-value regrowth and essential habitat mapping. These change...

Read More

Testamentary Trust

What is a Testamentary Trust [TT]? TT is a trust created under a person’s will which does not come into effect until after their death. TT has similar characteristics to a discretionary or family trust except the provisions of the trust are set out in th...

Read More

Access regulations for the Petroleum Act

Petroleum Act will come into force on 1 January 2021 The implementation of land access regulations for the Petroleum Act must be the catalyst for requiring the mining sector to operate in a similar manner, this is the position the Northern Territory Cattlemen&...

Read More

Emanate Legal's Barry Taylor comments on landowner rights during trespass

Townsville, Queensland: Queensland lawyer/solicitor Barry Taylor, Foundation Director of Emanate Legal, recently commented on the rights of farming landowners and leaseholders in response to a number of trespass incidents on primary producing properties. &ldqu...

Read More

Introductory Guide to Resumption and Compulsory Acquisition in Queensland

Introductory Guide to Resumption and Compulsory Acquisition in Queensland Written by Emanate Legal’s Barry Taylor (Lawyer/Solicitor) & Venesa Gleeson (Lawyer/Solicitor) Introduction In Queensland, the State or Local Governments can apply to take a...

Read More

Vegetation clearing management services updated

Barry Taylor, Townsville solicitor and foundation member of Emanate Legal, recently updated the information on the Services pages relating to Clearing Management.The updated page outlines the changes made by Queensland in relation to the laws for clearing vege...

Read More

Restructuring family assets for succession services updated

Barry Taylor, Townsville solicitor and foundation member of Emanate Legal, recently updated the information on the Services pages relating to Restructure of Family Assets.The updated services page contains information pertinent to primary producing families an...

Read More

Queensland grazier fined $450k for illegal land clearing

A Queensland grazier, whose bid to bulldoze native woodlands has the support of Federal Government MPs, has been hit with one of the state's heaviest penalties for illegal land clearing. Scott Harris and his company were fined $450,000 in the Cairns Magistrate...

Read More